The comfort of narrow handlebars.

A light bike doesn't replace good fitness.

Moderator: Moderator Team

Post Reply
Shrike
Posts: 2019
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 5:08 pm

by Shrike

Waited for weeks to get the Aerofly II's at 40cm, just couldn't get them at the price I wanted so ended up taking a punt on 38's.

Got them yesterday and they look like some child's toy :D

Mildly concerned but I'm pretty sure I'll love them and adapt fast. Always wanted to ride 38s, just erred on the side of caution. I have broad shoulders, so any guide or common wisdom you come across suggests 42 to 44cm for me.

Screw that though, why let the lemmings dictate biomechanics. Many of us can adapt to a wide range very quickly.

I'm more wondering if they'll make the bike twitchier.

User avatar
Klaster_1
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 10:25 am
Location: Paphos, Cyprus

by Klaster_1

Shrike wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:03 pm
I'm more wondering if they'll make the bike twitchier.
When I went from a 44cm Ergonova to a 40cm Ellipse, the bike felt more twitchy indeed, but I got used to it and don't even remember how it used to be.

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



CustomMetal
Moderator
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2018 4:14 pm
Location: UK

by CustomMetal

I run the ENVE 42mm bars which are flared. My hoods are 36mm apart. Took a while to get used to but now getting on anything wider feels like steering a bus! Also feels a lot faster and more aero
Allegra- Steel Lugs TBC
Aurelia- Stainless All Road 8.5kg
Bertha- TT 9.8kg
Perdita- Ti Turbo bike 8kg
Serenity- Ti Gravel 9.5kg/8.9kg
Verity- Ti Aero 8.2kg
Alya- Ti Climbing TBC

All weights with pedals,cages & garmin mount

Robius
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 12:35 am

by Robius

Some new alloy aero bars from PRO: https://road.cc/content/tech-news/pro-a ... ags-277711

36cm Pro Vibe Alloy Pursuit is on my wishlist already. They are looking slick with that flare.
2016 Felt AR2 Di2
Retired:
2017 Giant TCR Pro 2
2015 Cannondale Synapse 6

Spurdo
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2019 10:33 am

by Spurdo

Switched from a 44cm to 40cm, did not have much problems outdoors but on trainer my left hand started to hurt a bit. After switching I've had no problems and I have noticed that my grip on the hoods is different and my wrists no longer roll towards the center.

User avatar
ms6073
Posts: 4288
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Houston, Texas

by ms6073

CustomMetal wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 11:21 pm
I run the ENVE 42mm bars which are flared. My hoods are 36mm apart.
I also made the switch from the round Enve road bars and I would say after 2-3 rides, I was very happy with the decision. I am expecting a C64 disc drameset this week and want to continue running the Enve SES bars but not keen on cutting the bar ends to run a Shimano EW-RS910.
- Michael
"People should stop expecting normal from me... seriously, we all know it's never going to happen"

User avatar
Conza
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:28 am
Location: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Contact:

by Conza

Hmm. I've measured 42cm's.
Accidentally got 40cm and have sent them back.
This has me reconsidering.
It's all about the adventure :o .

TheRich
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2019 1:36 am

by TheRich

Has anyone gone narrower and NOT liked it?

Current bike is road/gravel with frame size appropriate 42mm bars, which seem fine for even light mountain biking.

Edit: Forgot to finish my thought...I'm about to order a P1 Emonda and currently waffling between 40 and 38mm bars.

TobinHatesYou
Posts: 12444
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm

by TobinHatesYou

TheRich wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:52 am

Edit: Forgot to finish my thought...I'm about to order a P1 Emonda and currently waffling between 40 and 38mm bars.

The Aeolus RSL bars or a separate bar/stem? I'd need a 110mm/38cm Aeolus and they don't make one. :(

LewisK
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Oct 31, 2019 2:11 pm

by LewisK

TheRich wrote:
Sat Nov 07, 2020 12:52 am
Has anyone gone narrower and NOT liked it?

Current bike is road/gravel with frame size appropriate 42mm bars, which seem fine for even light mountain biking.

Edit: Forgot to finish my thought...I'm about to order a P1 Emonda and currently waffling between 40 and 38mm bars.
I went from 42s to 40s, took a few rides to get used to but overall i prefer it. Wouldnt want to go any narrower i dont think.

TheRich
Posts: 1037
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2019 1:36 am

by TheRich

LewisK wrote:
Mon Nov 09, 2020 2:02 pm

I went from 42s to 40s, took a few rides to get used to but overall i prefer it. Wouldnt want to go any narrower i dont think.
What makes you feel that way?

NordicSal
Posts: 279
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2019 11:09 pm

by NordicSal

Shrike wrote:
Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:03 pm
Waited for weeks to get the Aerofly II's at 40cm, just couldn't get them at the price I wanted so ended up taking a punt on 38's.

Got them yesterday and they look like some child's toy :D

Mildly concerned but I'm pretty sure I'll love them and adapt fast. Always wanted to ride 38s, just erred on the side of caution. I have broad shoulders, so any guide or common wisdom you come across suggests 42 to 44cm for me.

Screw that though, why let the lemmings dictate biomechanics. Many of us can adapt to a wide range very quickly.

I'm more wondering if they'll make the bike twitchier.
I am coming from 44's, can't decide whether to just go for the 38's straight away or be "reasonable" and do the 40's.

User avatar
Mr.Gib
Posts: 5548
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2005 4:12 pm
Location: eh?

by Mr.Gib

I'd be careful with a big step down in size. Consider what you hope to acheive. If you're racing and spend a lot of time at the front of a line and want to be a bit more aero, than go for it. It makes no difference in the saddle from what I can tell, but if you are just riding for fun you might not like the different feel when out of the saddle. I dropped down to 40 from riding 42 and 44 depending on the bike, and the bike is just a bit more squirrely out of the saddle. Easy to manage and adapt but more input is required. I prefer wider but a damaged shoulder gives me no option but to go narrower.
wheelsONfire wrote: When we ride disc brakes the whole deal of braking is just like a leaving a fart. It happens and then it's over. Nothing planned and nothing to get nervous for.

hofweber
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2020 10:33 am

by hofweber

In case you’re looking for Enve-like dimensions without enve prices, I got two pairs of the Rose Race Attack GF Aero at 36cm. They measure 36 hood to hood and 40,5 drop to drop
https://www.rosebikes.se/rose-race-atta ... _size=36cm

by Weenie


Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓    Broad Selection ✓    Worldwide Delivery ✓

www.starbike.com



iheartbianchi
Posts: 680
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:17 am

by iheartbianchi

People already made this point but there's no loss in oxygen intake from using a narrower position, or a lower position.

It's all a matter of balancing comfort and aero. With the caveat that in extreme aero or low positions, you may need to exert more energy to maintain that position and to use more "breathing muscles" which may increase your oxygen demand, decreasing efficiencies until you have adapated. But the intake remains more or less the same.

As a real world illustration, time trialists still use TT bars, which is the most extreme narrow position.
Bianchi Oltre XR4
Celeste Matte
Campy SR 11spd mechanical
Bora Ultra 50 tubs
Viseon 5D / stock bits and parts

Bianchi Specialissima Pantani Edition
Campy R 12spd mechanical
Fulcrum Racing Speed 35 tubs
FSA / Deda bits and parts

Post Reply