46-36 FC-R8100/FC-R9200 update
Moderator: Moderator Team
Wait, whaaaaaat?
There's nothing I can see on Shimano website?
Edit: OK, can see it there now. Have the Ultegra/DA front derailleurs been pre-designed to be mounted lower on a standard road-bike braze-on to accomodate the 46t ring? I get a sense this might not work on some bikes with braze-ons too high?
There's nothing I can see on Shimano website?
Edit: OK, can see it there now. Have the Ultegra/DA front derailleurs been pre-designed to be mounted lower on a standard road-bike braze-on to accomodate the 46t ring? I get a sense this might not work on some bikes with braze-ons too high?
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Shimano Australia didn't even know this was out yet when I rang to enquire about availability...
Having considered this further, I can't understand why Shimano introduced this on race-focused Ultegra/DA and not on 105...?
105 (particularly as the derailleur has compatability with the 11-36) is being marketed as the "all-road" middle ground between DA/Ultegra (pure race setup) and GRX 12 (with it's gravel focused +2.5mm chainline and clutched RD). Perfect for for weekend warriors doing sportives and such, with the standard road chainline and these are precisely the kinds of riders who would benefit from these chainrings.
Having considered this further, I can't understand why Shimano introduced this on race-focused Ultegra/DA and not on 105...?
105 (particularly as the derailleur has compatability with the 11-36) is being marketed as the "all-road" middle ground between DA/Ultegra (pure race setup) and GRX 12 (with it's gravel focused +2.5mm chainline and clutched RD). Perfect for for weekend warriors doing sportives and such, with the standard road chainline and these are precisely the kinds of riders who would benefit from these chainrings.
Dura-Ace:
4550170852481 - IFCR9200MX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 160.0 mm
4550170852436 - IFCR9200AX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 165.0 mm
4550170852443 - IFCR9200BX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 167.5 mm
4550170852511 - IFCR9200CX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 170.0 mm
4550170852528 - IFCR9200DX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 172.5 mm
4550170852467 - IFCR9200EX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 175.0 mm
4550170852504 - IFCR9200FX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 177.5 mm
Ultegra:
4550170852535 - IFCR8100MX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 160.0 mm
4550170852429 - IFCR8100AX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 165.0 mm
4550170852474 - IFCR8100CX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 170.0 mm
4550170852498 - IFCR8100DX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 172.5 mm
4550170852450 - IFCR8100EX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 175.0 mm
4550170852481 - IFCR9200MX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 160.0 mm
4550170852436 - IFCR9200AX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 165.0 mm
4550170852443 - IFCR9200BX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 167.5 mm
4550170852511 - IFCR9200CX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 170.0 mm
4550170852528 - IFCR9200DX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 172.5 mm
4550170852467 - IFCR9200EX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 175.0 mm
4550170852504 - IFCR9200FX66 - FC-R9200 46-36T 177.5 mm
Ultegra:
4550170852535 - IFCR8100MX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 160.0 mm
4550170852429 - IFCR8100AX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 165.0 mm
4550170852474 - IFCR8100CX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 170.0 mm
4550170852498 - IFCR8100DX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 172.5 mm
4550170852450 - IFCR8100EX66 - FC-R8100 46-36T 175.0 mm
'
Because these chainrings are made for racing.
Because these chainrings are made for racing.
[/quote]
or rather that the 105 group is for a more "quiet" cycling, which does not mean that you cannot compete with it.....
I see.. thanks for you reply.. I’m just thinking a work around for using the new GRX making it Di2 as a 11-34 would be sufficient for my ridingharblhat wrote:The listed capacity is 16T, so 46-30 should work. However a 30T small ring is not explicitly supported by Shimano.
- ultimobici
- in the industry
- Posts: 4463
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Trento, Italia
- Contact:
They won’t work properly. You may be able to fudge them so they work acceptably but they’ll not be that slick in operation.Ritxis wrote:We are still more interested in knowing the compatibility of the 12 levers (GRX-105) with the previous 11 rear derailleurs.....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's a good option, definitely better than using third party cranks/rings. If you don't need a clutch and the 30-34 gearing is low enough for you then its totally workable.
The one potential issue is the GRX crankset chain line is 2.5mm further out than 12s road. People have been able to take this up with standard FD adjustments but I would say it depends on the frame.
I'm running a 9200 FD along with 11-speed GRX 48/31 chainrings, but not on a stock GRX crank. I'm using a modular crankset, one where I could choose the length of the axle. Hence I'm on par with the 9200 chainline. Prior to getting the modular crank I was using the stock GRX crankset but with 2mm chainring washers that offset both chainring inboards. The unique GRX chainring mounting system (8 bolts total) makes inboard chainline adjustments possible.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com