ZFC/chain waxing
Moderator: robbosmans
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:30 am
If you have to heat up and melt a litre of wax or whatever every single time you want to lubrication your chain, then no I don't think that is environmentally friendly at all. I stopped doing it.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
I'm trying to understand your point.BenCousins wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:14 pm'The individual above' is interested in isolating and understanding the proportional effect of regular cleaning versus the lube itself, given waxing also includes a change to cleaning regime.
I guess the issue with that test is it doesn't shift product as well in this modern world of 'reviews' and 'lab tests' that are closely connected to commerce.
When waxing chains you degrease it before the first waxtreatment. This means that the chain is completely clean before the first waxing. When riding in wet conditions, you put the chain in boiling water to get it clean. The boiling water removes dirt and wax. The chain will be close to completely clean after dipped in boiling water. There will almost be no wax on the chain and no dirt. Thats why you put it boiling water.
Now, when using the old regime with regular lube, the chain will always be dirty, because lube and dirt collects in the pins and rollers. So the difference between waxing and lubing means having a clean chain or having a dirty chain. If you completely degreased your lubed chain in order to remove all grease and dirt from the pins and rollers after every ride, and relubed before the next ride, you would surely get a significantly longer lifespan out of your lubed chain.
So is the longer lifespan of a waxed chain caused by the wax istelf? Or is it because the process of waxing always requires a clean chain?
-
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 6:48 pm
- Location: Central EU
That's very personal. Last week I waxed 8 chains in one session. So energy consumption is very low per chain.fatpinarellorider wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:00 pmIf you have to heat up and melt a litre of wax or whatever every single time you want to lubrication your chain, then no I don't think that is environmentally friendly at all. I stopped doing it.
That is a false dichotomy given you cannot have a state of always clean chain while riding with the normal oil dripping method since dirts and grimes will always gets in the pins and links no matter how clean it is after fresh degreasing/ cleaning session.
With waxing dirts can hardly enter the nooks and crannies of the entire chain system during your ride so its therefore comparatively much cleaner before and after cleaning/ riding. Even compared to oiled chain That gets frequent degreasing, waxed chain is likely to be way more long lasting.
The process and the results are interlinked. You cant have one without the other. The best you can do if you dislike immersive waxing is using drip wax solution.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
With waxing dirts can hardly enter the nooks and crannies of the entire chain system during your ride so its therefore comparatively much cleaner before and after cleaning/ riding. Even compared to oiled chain That gets frequent degreasing, waxed chain is likely to be way more long lasting.
The process and the results are interlinked. You cant have one without the other. The best you can do if you dislike immersive waxing is using drip wax solution.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Neither. Wax doesn't attract dirt so the chain stays clean. Dirt causes wear. Wax in and of itself isn't a good lubricant, but this is offset by the fact that it keeps the chain clean and acts as a barrier to dirt intrusion into the chain. The WS2 additive in Silca wax and MSW seems to help with lubrication and longevity of the lube as well.EugeneC wrote:I'm trying to understand your point.BenCousins wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:14 pm'The individual above' is interested in isolating and understanding the proportional effect of regular cleaning versus the lube itself, given waxing also includes a change to cleaning regime.
I guess the issue with that test is it doesn't shift product as well in this modern world of 'reviews' and 'lab tests' that are closely connected to commerce.
When waxing chains you degrease it before the first waxtreatment. This means that the chain is completely clean before the first waxing. When riding in wet conditions, you put the chain in boiling water to get it clean. The boiling water removes dirt and wax. The chain will be close to completely clean after dipped in boiling water. There will almost be no wax on the chain and no dirt. Thats why you put it boiling water.
Now, when using the old regime with regular lube, the chain will always be dirty, because lube and dirt collects in the pins and rollers. So the difference between waxing and lubing means having a clean chain or having a dirty chain. If you completely degreased your lubed chain in order to remove all grease and dirt from the pins and rollers after every ride, and relubed before the next ride, you would surely get a significantly longer lifespan out of your lubed chain.
So is the longer lifespan of a waxed chain caused by the wax istelf? Or is it because the process of waxing always requires a clean chain?
not a lot of press coverage but finish line has anounced a new product in this space.
Finish Line HALO Hot Wax
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/silca-fi ... ain-waxing
Finish Line HALO Hot Wax
https://www.bikeradar.com/news/silca-fi ... ain-waxing
Current Rides:
2023 Tarmac SL7 Di2 9270
ex 2019 S-works SL6
ex 2018 Trek Madone SLR Disc
ex 2016 Giant TCRAdvanced Sl
ex 2012 Trek Madone7
2023 Tarmac SL7 Di2 9270
ex 2019 S-works SL6
ex 2018 Trek Madone SLR Disc
ex 2016 Giant TCRAdvanced Sl
ex 2012 Trek Madone7
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2023 4:13 pm
warming up a pot is not environmentally friendly?fatpinarellorider wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:00 pmIf you have to heat up and melt a litre of wax or whatever every single time you want to lubrication your chain, then no I don't think that is environmentally friendly at all. I stopped doing it.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:30 am
Not if you have to use a gas stove to do it.EtoDemerzel wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:19 amwarming up a pot is not environmentally friendly?fatpinarellorider wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:00 pmIf you have to heat up and melt a litre of wax or whatever every single time you want to lubrication your chain, then no I don't think that is environmentally friendly at all. I stopped doing it.
-
- Posts: 177
- Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2023 4:13 pm
I don't care what anyone uses for chain lube but that's a wild take. What's your environmetally friendly alternative? Petroleum distillates, solvents, hydrocarbons, PTFE and PFC's in bicycle lubes then wash your bike, what do you do with the drain off?fatpinarellorider wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 5:37 amNot if you have to use a gas stove to do it.EtoDemerzel wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 2:19 amwarming up a pot is not environmentally friendly?fatpinarellorider wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 3:00 pmIf you have to heat up and melt a litre of wax or whatever every single time you want to lubrication your chain, then no I don't think that is environmentally friendly at all. I stopped doing it.
wax is by far the most environmentally friendly way to lube your drivetrain. Don't want to use a gas stove, use a electric heating element.
My point is, that it's the dirt that causes wear. And we seem to agree on that.MikeD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 6:04 pmNeither. Wax doesn't attract dirt so the chain stays clean. Dirt causes wear. Wax in and of itself isn't a good lubricant, but this is offset by the fact that it keeps the chain clean and acts as a barrier to dirt intrusion into the chain. The WS2 additive in Silca wax and MSW seems to help with lubrication and longevity of the lube as well.
Since a lubed chain always will be filled with dirt in the pins and rollers, that is probably what causes the shorter lifespan of a lubed chain.
Not necessarily so. For bike chains it maybe a very effective lube - Block 1 of the ZFC test is a pure lubrication test ie. no contamination or water, and wax outperforms all the oils.
I would like to see regular gear changes included in the test protocol. This would dislodge wax, especially between the side plates and allow contamination in. As it is, I think the test favours wax.
Mark
dromarti.com
dromarti.com
-
- Posts: 1370
- Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 11:46 am
Yep, that is my point. What proportion of the lifespan increase is simply the fact that the chain is cleaned more often, and more throughly.EugeneC wrote: ↑Tue Feb 27, 2024 4:10 pmI'm trying to understand your point.BenCousins wrote: ↑Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:14 pm'The individual above' is interested in isolating and understanding the proportional effect of regular cleaning versus the lube itself, given waxing also includes a change to cleaning regime.
I guess the issue with that test is it doesn't shift product as well in this modern world of 'reviews' and 'lab tests' that are closely connected to commerce.
When waxing chains you degrease it before the first waxtreatment. This means that the chain is completely clean before the first waxing. When riding in wet conditions, you put the chain in boiling water to get it clean. The boiling water removes dirt and wax. The chain will be close to completely clean after dipped in boiling water. There will almost be no wax on the chain and no dirt. Thats why you put it boiling water.
Now, when using the old regime with regular lube, the chain will always be dirty, because lube and dirt collects in the pins and rollers. So the difference between waxing and lubing means having a clean chain or having a dirty chain. If you completely degreased your lubed chain in order to remove all grease and dirt from the pins and rollers after every ride, and relubed before the next ride, you would surely get a significantly longer lifespan out of your lubed chain.
So is the longer lifespan of a waxed chain caused by the wax istelf? Or is it because the process of waxing always requires a clean chain?
Do you ever see wax used for lubrication in machinery or motor vehicles? No. In the absence of dirt, wax is a poor lubricant. The low friction that ZFC observes with wax is misleading. Solid lubricants get pushed out of the bearing area and can't flow back because they're not liquid. Viscous friction that might be observed there is not going to cause wear.iow wrote:Not necessarily so. For bike chains it maybe a very effective lube - Block 1 of the ZFC test is a pure lubrication test ie. no contamination or water, and wax outperforms all the oils.
I would like to see regular gear changes included in the test protocol. This would dislodge wax, especially between the side plates and allow contamination in. As it is, I think the test favours wax.
In the absense of dirt is the operative phrase here. With liquid lubricants you're never without dirt on a bike chain outside an indoor velodrome. It just won't happen. Your front wheel literally slings dust and dirt straight into the chain all the time when you ride outside.MikeD wrote: ↑Wed Feb 28, 2024 4:47 pmDo you ever see wax used for lubrication in machinery or motor vehicles? No. In the absence of dirt, wax is a poor lubricant. The low friction that ZFC observes with wax is misleading. Solid lubricants get pushed out of the bearing area and can't flow back because they're not liquid. Viscous friction that might be observed there is not going to cause wear.iow wrote:Not necessarily so. For bike chains it maybe a very effective lube - Block 1 of the ZFC test is a pure lubrication test ie. no contamination or water, and wax outperforms all the oils.
I would like to see regular gear changes included in the test protocol. This would dislodge wax, especially between the side plates and allow contamination in. As it is, I think the test favours wax.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com