Zipp stem compatibility issues?
Moderator: robbosmans
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:01 am
With my SC (non-SL), which I have in the picture, it has already left marks even without mounting the faceplate and tightening the bolts. It's just marks from pushing the bar to click into position (in which position it is then almost fixed, without the faceplate, making it difficult even to rotate the bar to different angles)
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
-
- Posts: 12570
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2017 12:02 pm
I experienced this with my Zipp SL Sprint stem. I saw it as a minor annoyance and it didn't cause anymore superficial marring to the clamping area of my bars than any other stem would.
- wheelbuilder
- Posts: 1215
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 2:10 am
It's also a claimed strength feature to have a slip-fit type connection of bar to stem. I have the carbon speed sl and it has the same installation behavior with Ritchey carbon Evo curve and Bontrager carbon xxx bars. Never a problem and certainly nothing to fret about. Road cycling is inherently dangerous if done correctly.
Never cheer before you know who is winning
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:01 am
But is that slip-fit or pressfit (as in press it in hard and the forget about rotating the bar unless you want to damage its surface)?wheelbuilder wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 6:30 amIt's also a claimed strength feature to have a slip-fit type connection of bar to stem. I have the carbon speed sl and it has the same installation behavior with Ritchey carbon Evo curve and Bontrager carbon xxx bars. Never a problem and certainly nothing to fret about. Road cycling is inherently dangerous if done correctly.
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
- Location: California's country side
I think they made the carbon part a little tighter, because it is flexible and to anticipate for wear.
I don't see the rationale though using that stem and a relatively cheap aluminum bar? If you used a carbon bar, then both gives in a little (as in indentation of the bar, after tightening). Then there would be less stress on the stem giving in to aluminum.
I don't see the rationale though using that stem and a relatively cheap aluminum bar? If you used a carbon bar, then both gives in a little (as in indentation of the bar, after tightening). Then there would be less stress on the stem giving in to aluminum.
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:01 am
I got the carbon stem at a great price, and I needed a minus 12 degree one. That's the only reason I went for it. It's for a gravel bike, so there's no need to a carbon bar (low pressure high-volume tubeless tires will take care of comfort).PoorCyclist wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 4:17 pmI think they made the carbon part a little tighter, because it is flexible and to anticipate for wear.
I don't see the rationale though using that stem and a relatively cheap aluminum bar? If you used a carbon bar, then both gives in a little (as in indentation of the bar, after tightening). Then there would be less stress on the stem giving in to aluminum.
My main problem is that the aluminum stem is even tighter on the same bar as the carbon stem (just as a reminder: all 3 are the same brand).
-
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2011 1:26 am
- Location: California's country side
Do you have a caliper you can measure the interface at the bar? I think it may be more than 31.8mm or whatever it is spec'd
-
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:01 am
My digital caliper may not be a high-precision model (it was cheap), but it shows 31.8mm vertically (which is what matters for the clamping area), maybe a bit over that horizontally (but I didn't rotate the bars 90 degrees, so the horizontal excess, if there is any, does not matter).PoorCyclist wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2023 7:08 pmDo you have a caliper you can measure the interface at the bar? I think it may be more than 31.8mm or whatever it is spec'd
And, as I said, the bars slot in perfectly in the 3 Specialized stems I've tried.
What's even more puzzling is that the Zipp stems work fine with other bars too.
So it's just the combination of the Zipp bars with the Zipp stems (maybe they are designed to fit really snugly, while my other bars are slightly under 31.8 and my other stems are slightly over 31.. I'm just clueless and Zipp customer service could not really help