Another scam site
Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team
You don't want to think that cycling is used by scammers every day, but it is these days.
Here's an alleged Tune site I negligently gave info to, with no response at all:
https://www.tunepart.com/
Then I saw the listed address was a Walmart in Las Vegas, and saved .htms look suspicious, with a "grubby-war-3" component.
Can any techies here find more info?
About all I know how to do is source a page:
view-source:https://www.tunepart.com/
Here's an alleged Tune site I negligently gave info to, with no response at all:
https://www.tunepart.com/
Then I saw the listed address was a Walmart in Las Vegas, and saved .htms look suspicious, with a "grubby-war-3" component.
Can any techies here find more info?
About all I know how to do is source a page:
view-source:https://www.tunepart.com/
Here's a tracing route summary:
traceroute to tunepart.com (104.21.71.171), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 ip-10-0-0-14.ec2.internal (10.0.0.14) 0.772 ms 1.054 ms 1.042 ms
2 216.182.226.32 (216.182.226.32) 15.442 ms 216.182.238.147 (216.182.238.147) 2.660 ms 216.182.238.129 (216.182.238.129) 4.156 ms
3 100.65.83.144 (100.65.83.144) 4.915 ms 100.66.8.6 (100.66.8.6) 13.057 ms 100.66.37.70 (100.66.37.70) 2.560 ms
4 100.66.10.200 (100.66.10.200) 10.259 ms 100.66.60.140 (100.66.60.140) 19.742 ms 100.66.10.98 (100.66.10.98) 23.233 ms
5 241.0.4.223 (241.0.4.223) 1.605 ms 100.66.42.174 (100.66.42.174) 476.013 ms 241.0.4.212 (241.0.4.212) 1.690 ms
6 240.0.40.18 (240.0.40.18) 926.425 ms 240.0.40.16 (240.0.40.16) 901.787 ms 241.0.4.202 (241.0.4.202) 1.104 ms
7 240.0.40.27 (240.0.40.27) 823.552 ms 240.0.40.17 (240.0.40.17) 829.509 ms 240.0.40.22 (240.0.40.22) 961.153 ms
8 242.0.171.17 (242.0.171.17) 1.232 ms 240.0.40.23 (240.0.40.23) 896.750 ms 240.0.40.27 (240.0.40.27) 821.992 ms
9 52.93.28.177 (52.93.28.177) 1.339 ms 52.93.28.197 (52.93.28.197) 1.519 ms 52.93.28.195 (52.93.28.195) 1.585 ms
10 52.93.28.193 (52.93.28.193) 1.829 ms 100.100.34.92 (100.100.34.92) 2.323 ms 100.100.34.94 (100.100.34.94) 1.792 ms
11 99.83.90.167 (99.83.90.167) 7.645 ms 99.83.90.51 (99.83.90.51) 2.407 ms 2.476 ms
12 172.71.220.3 (172.71.220.3) 3.083 ms 173.245.63.239 (173.245.63.239) 2.291 ms 99.83.90.167 (99.83.90.167) 3.854 ms
13 173.245.63.239 (173.245.63.239) 2.436 ms 104.21.71.171 (104.21.71.171) 2.065 ms 172.70.132.2 (172.70.132.2) 1.940 ms
There is no need for this kind of routing for a simple bike site.
Plus there is no identifying info of any kind as to who is behind this.
My advice is to avoid tunepart.com
traceroute to tunepart.com (104.21.71.171), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 ip-10-0-0-14.ec2.internal (10.0.0.14) 0.772 ms 1.054 ms 1.042 ms
2 216.182.226.32 (216.182.226.32) 15.442 ms 216.182.238.147 (216.182.238.147) 2.660 ms 216.182.238.129 (216.182.238.129) 4.156 ms
3 100.65.83.144 (100.65.83.144) 4.915 ms 100.66.8.6 (100.66.8.6) 13.057 ms 100.66.37.70 (100.66.37.70) 2.560 ms
4 100.66.10.200 (100.66.10.200) 10.259 ms 100.66.60.140 (100.66.60.140) 19.742 ms 100.66.10.98 (100.66.10.98) 23.233 ms
5 241.0.4.223 (241.0.4.223) 1.605 ms 100.66.42.174 (100.66.42.174) 476.013 ms 241.0.4.212 (241.0.4.212) 1.690 ms
6 240.0.40.18 (240.0.40.18) 926.425 ms 240.0.40.16 (240.0.40.16) 901.787 ms 241.0.4.202 (241.0.4.202) 1.104 ms
7 240.0.40.27 (240.0.40.27) 823.552 ms 240.0.40.17 (240.0.40.17) 829.509 ms 240.0.40.22 (240.0.40.22) 961.153 ms
8 242.0.171.17 (242.0.171.17) 1.232 ms 240.0.40.23 (240.0.40.23) 896.750 ms 240.0.40.27 (240.0.40.27) 821.992 ms
9 52.93.28.177 (52.93.28.177) 1.339 ms 52.93.28.197 (52.93.28.197) 1.519 ms 52.93.28.195 (52.93.28.195) 1.585 ms
10 52.93.28.193 (52.93.28.193) 1.829 ms 100.100.34.92 (100.100.34.92) 2.323 ms 100.100.34.94 (100.100.34.94) 1.792 ms
11 99.83.90.167 (99.83.90.167) 7.645 ms 99.83.90.51 (99.83.90.51) 2.407 ms 2.476 ms
12 172.71.220.3 (172.71.220.3) 3.083 ms 173.245.63.239 (173.245.63.239) 2.291 ms 99.83.90.167 (99.83.90.167) 3.854 ms
13 173.245.63.239 (173.245.63.239) 2.436 ms 104.21.71.171 (104.21.71.171) 2.065 ms 172.70.132.2 (172.70.132.2) 1.940 ms
There is no need for this kind of routing for a simple bike site.
Plus there is no identifying info of any kind as to who is behind this.
My advice is to avoid tunepart.com
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
Found several likely SRAM fakes. It looks like a good way to identify is the contact us info. One also points to a Walmart in Las Vegas. Another to the Gugenheim in New York. Another to somewhere in Kansas. I really wanted them to be true though!
https://www.cyclesram.com/
https://www.sramupon.com/
https://www.partssram.com/
https://www.cyclesram.com/
https://www.sramupon.com/
https://www.partssram.com/
Schwalbe is also concerned with similar fake dealer sites:
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/stay ... -customers
Hope this isn't trending.
https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/stay ... -customers
Hope this isn't trending.
To add to this, as I was searching for a POC Tempor I found this...91Euro for a POC Tempor. I asked on the official POC website and they confirmed its not their site and they think its scam
www.poccycling.com
www.poccycling.com
-
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:16 am
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com