2023 Pro thread
Moderators: robbosmans, Moderator Team
- robbosmans
- Moderator
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:40 pm
- Location: Central Belgium
- Contact:
You can’t really compare a flatbar to a dropbar, on a wide flatbar you can still control the brake levers, on a wide dropbar your wristangle will be so bad that braking requires you to wrap your whole hand around the shifter.

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
- ultimobici
- in the industry
- Posts: 4330
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Trento, Italia
- Contact:
Surely the width of bar is dependent on the discipline? Track to road to gravel should logically see an increase in width for most people.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Too much factors to make a general assumption.
Not only the bar width is relevant for control and steering. Head tube angle, offset/trail, reach, etc. Lots of differences between bikes.
And in the end personal preferences and skills in regards to the race track are most important. Some people are better in bike handling, than others. Some tracks are technically very difficult, others have no significant obstacles.
Not only the bar width is relevant for control and steering. Head tube angle, offset/trail, reach, etc. Lots of differences between bikes.
And in the end personal preferences and skills in regards to the race track are most important. Some people are better in bike handling, than others. Some tracks are technically very difficult, others have no significant obstacles.
^exactly thisDiscodan wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:51 pmI’d have to disagree based on experience on road, gravel, and MTB. A narrow bar is harder to control when a bump kicks it, and harder to accurately steer. it’s just basic physics that if a lever is twice as long (half of a really wide bar) it takes half the force to control it and the bar end will move twice as far so it’s easier to have granular control.
Narrow bars are better for fast, agressive inputs (like a small steering wheel on a sports car) but for gravel you don’t want that. It’s the same reason XC MTB has been moving from 600mm bars to much wider ones over the years
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
kkibbler wrote: WW remembers.
Narrower bars are always faster* but take more skill and strength to not get knocked offline by bumps.
*More aero and for treed MTB trails let you take a tighter line around turns. I used to race MTB with Keegan and know his skills and appreciation for aero so I loved that pick of him winning in front of a much wider bar.
*More aero and for treed MTB trails let you take a tighter line around turns. I used to race MTB with Keegan and know his skills and appreciation for aero so I loved that pick of him winning in front of a much wider bar.
Nah. Even CX (as technically difficult as those courses are) isn't hugely bumpy. And meanwhile, the last 15 years of XCO bike setup happened.robbosmans wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:00 pmWide bars don’t give more control, they only make it harder to reach the brakes. Most cx riders these days also have quite narrow bars, MVDP for example runs 40’s on cx.
Wide bars where just a trend with the advantage of being able to fit bar bags etc.
If you have any trouble reaching brake levers on flared bars you've plain set them up wrong.
- robbosmans
- Moderator
- Posts: 2677
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 12:40 pm
- Location: Central Belgium
- Contact:
Its bikefitting 101, excessive wide bars means your wrist will be turned in resulting in having to reach around the lever.


That's a tough argument to sustain. The trigonometry suggests moving hoods 2 - 3cm inboard doesn't effectively change reach given the average male arm length of 75 to 80 cm. And if the shoulders are particularely wide the reach could increase. Not sure how it gets harder to reach the brakes. That diagram suggest that too narrow is an equal problem. Perhaps your example involves bars that are innapropriately wide for a rider in the first place, but I assume we are not basing this theory on the performance of equipment that is ill fitting.robbosmans wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:00 pmWide bars don’t give more control, they only make it harder to reach the brakes.
And the bit about control, just grip the bars on either side of the stem and try a technical descent, climb out of the saddle, ride some twisty gravel, etc. Perhaps you find more control with your hands closer together, but it hasn't worked that way for me.
Jonas Vingegaard was stellar in the Dauphine TT. Best climber in the world smokes Cavagna in a flatish TT. Pogacar will have his hands full at the TdF even if he can get to 100 percent.
Bjerg got his first win. Yet again mentioned his wife in post race interview. Can't blame him.
wheelsONfire wrote: When we ride disc brakes the whole deal of braking is just like a leaving a fart. It happens and then it's over. Nothing planned and nothing to get nervous for.
- spokenwords
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:21 am
This pro thread is getting...bad.
"Notice how the door closes when the chimes of freedom ring." Joe Strummer
"this goes to 11" Nigel Tufnel
Dont move to Austin
Major Taylor rules.
"this goes to 11" Nigel Tufnel
Dont move to Austin
Major Taylor rules.
So watch some pro racing and make a contribution.
wheelsONfire wrote: When we ride disc brakes the whole deal of braking is just like a leaving a fart. It happens and then it's over. Nothing planned and nothing to get nervous for.
Oh yes. As a Dane I'm really enjoying itMr.Gib wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 10:16 pmThat's a tough argument to sustain. The trigonometry suggests moving hoods 2 - 3cm inboard doesn't effectively change reach given the average male arm length of 75 to 80 cm. And if the shoulders are particularely wide the reach could increase. Not sure how it gets harder to reach the brakes. That diagram suggest that too narrow is an equal problem. Perhaps your example involves bars that are innapropriately wide for a rider in the first place, but I assume we are not basing this theory on the performance of equipment that is ill fitting.robbosmans wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:00 pmWide bars don’t give more control, they only make it harder to reach the brakes.
And the bit about control, just grip the bars on either side of the stem and try a technical descent, climb out of the saddle, ride some twisty gravel, etc. Perhaps you find more control with your hands closer together, but it hasn't worked that way for me.
Jonas Vingegaard was stellar in the Dauphine TT. Best climber in the world smokes Cavagna in a flatish TT. Pogacar will have his hands full at the TdF even if he can get to 100 percent.
Bjerg got his first win. Yet again mentioned his wife in post race interview. Can't blame him.
Samuel Sanchez Gonzalez wrote:Ohh okay! I just knew "plug" was something to put inside a hole... yikes
the only thing that really concerns me re: bar width is breathing.
it's been tried over 3 decades ago; even Lance mentioned they tried narrow bars during his episode at cofidis and that ddn't work for him at all. AFAIK young riders were encouraged to try a size wider bars in order to get used to breathing in a racing position, and only later on move to a correct size. when i see new bikes factory spec'ed wth 40cm bars i can easily imagine all these people who give into this trend without any consideration and absolutely zero feedback, unless maybe they hang out with more seasoned riders (but then again- the attitude that new products are by default better, seems to be imprinted across the whole population these days, it's very apparent here at WW as well); the result is pretty obvious - less comfort and worse performance.
of course there are people who can accomodate narrow bars without any sacrifice, but this has to do with how they're built. there's a reason it's only a handful of pros riding narrower bars than they "should".
it's been tried over 3 decades ago; even Lance mentioned they tried narrow bars during his episode at cofidis and that ddn't work for him at all. AFAIK young riders were encouraged to try a size wider bars in order to get used to breathing in a racing position, and only later on move to a correct size. when i see new bikes factory spec'ed wth 40cm bars i can easily imagine all these people who give into this trend without any consideration and absolutely zero feedback, unless maybe they hang out with more seasoned riders (but then again- the attitude that new products are by default better, seems to be imprinted across the whole population these days, it's very apparent here at WW as well); the result is pretty obvious - less comfort and worse performance.
of course there are people who can accomodate narrow bars without any sacrifice, but this has to do with how they're built. there's a reason it's only a handful of pros riding narrower bars than they "should".
kkibbler wrote: WW remembers.
- ultimobici
- in the industry
- Posts: 4330
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: Trento, Italia
- Contact:
Lol! One 100km ride with one of the most conservative teams in cycling. Doubtful.tymon_tm wrote:even Lance mentioned they tried narrow bars during his episode at cofidis and that ddn't work for him at all.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com