basilic wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:27 am
You're funny, Gib, thanks for the visual. Yes, I meant "unsupported, packing super light, and staying in hotels". But that's not so different from having a support vehicle. I think the difference is in attitude: the accompanied tours are often all about biking, whereas the credit card tour aims at discovery/voyage/exploration. I certainly never go 200 km in a day.
It's almost the opposite for me, credit card tours are for skirting athletic limits whereas accompanied tours are about having a good time with a group of peers, usually ending early in the afternoon to have reasonable time for post-ride having a good time.
I can get a set of normal clothes, shoes, toiletries, charger, within 2 kg, including the saddle bag (so no naked dinners, but I sleep in the buff). So laundry every day. Plus rain gear, minimal backpack (packed), tools, spares, another 1 kg or so. Plus water and food, so maybe 4 to 5 kg added on the bike. I agree on sandals, I use softstar shoes (380g for a pair size 44, easy to pack, but a bit clownish). Pick a hotel with a restaurant or in a town that has one. On occasion I had to buy dinner at a supermarket, hence the backpack.
My setup is a ca 50:50 split (by mass) between saddle bag and backpack, keeps the bike nimble and I've learned that up to a certain point the backpack does not bother me at all. But beyond that point every tiny bit of extra load in the backpack feels like a torture sentence, hence the split. My off bike shoes are Mizuno Wave Universe 5, I think they are sub 100g per shoe in 48. Bought them before I had the bikepacking-sized saddle bag, when almost everything was in the backpack and even the tiniest weight saving made a big difference (e.g. one evening in a hotel I cut off most unused straps from the backpack, to save some grams). They don't make shoes like that anyomre, I treat them like a holy relic when not in use.
The trouble when trying to buy super lightweight shoes is that the lightest ones are so light
per pair that others that weigh roughly the same
per shoe are still advertized as extremely light. So you often see a weight number that *might* be competetive, but only if it was per shoe, not per pair. Spoiler: it's never per pair, for shoes made after the "barefoot" fashion wave of the early 2010s that ended almost ten years ago.