Long Bikepacking and Immersive Waxing

[ultimatist]

Appreciate it Reno, very insightful! I'm of the same mind re mixing; keep it in the family (e.g. Silca Wax + Super Secret) and it's often the same base so no need to boil/strip the chain after. I'm just begging to discover a step jump in durability that eliminates the need for prep and maintenance during events of reasonable distance. That would be the holy grail, and graphene seems to be the key, but the few options are prohibitively expensive: Silca is $150 for a small tin.

I've been playing with home recipies with mixed results. For example - and I assume you're in Reno and familiar with early season Sierra conditions - I did the Downieville All Mtn ride this weekend to scout for the race in July. Even with concerted efforts not to ride the Eagle 10 or 52 tooth cogs (reduce cross-chaining) on a new Silca waxed chain with PTFE and a few other friction modifiers added, I was hearing groans before I got the the top of the saddle/top. Riding thru snow drifts didn't seem to clean the chain, rather to strip more wax off. And it was crusty and ready for a new wax job at the end of the descent, with obvious sounds of drivetrain wear - that's only 30mi, albeit lots of slow and some mud.

I have a hypothesis that the hot conditions (80-92F on Wahoo) climbing up the exposed fire roads may have contributed to the wax softening and flowing out of the pins. Josh even mentioned this on Marginal Gains podcast. Next experiment is to try a paraffin base with a much higher melt point (180+) for summer conditions.

[renoracing]

Correct on the location, actually closer to Downieville than Reno these days... There are definitely conditions and days where it seems to be the perfect storm of things that wreak havoc on gear, and I've had those days where the chain is a mess way sooner than you'd expect, but also as mentioned, some days where its just humming along way longer than you'd imagine.
I totally agree that there is some work to be done on the different formulas for wax. I also heard that conversation with Josh, and I'd imagine its coming from Silca and others soon. Honestly it wouldn't be that big of a hassle. An additional $15 crock pot with a higher/lower temp wax for your chains in early season versus late season. I'm sure tire compound technology for specific conditions(temps) won't be too far behind, as these little marginal gains are all that is left.

[tiberiade]

It won't last 800 km, even in dry conditions.
- bring a wax-based lube
- bring a waxed chain and switch (but the weight!)

I did an 800km gravel race with this wax: https://www.effettomariposa.eu/pages/flowerpower-wax-lp. Even went through mud. Was still super smooth towards the end.

[ultimatist]

It won't last 800 km, even in dry conditions.
- bring a wax-based lube
- bring a waxed chain and switch (but the weight!)

I did an 800km gravel race with this wax: https://www.effettomariposa.eu/pages/flowerpower-wax-lp. Even went through mud. Was still super smooth towards the end.

Interesting, Sunflower wax . Seems like a very eco-friendly option as well.

[usr]

Seems like the best alternative is to relube immediately after the ride, when the chain is hot from use and sunshine, rather than next morning when it's cold and wet with dew.

After the ride is a given, unless perhaps if you are an oil traditionalist. But sleep breaks can be short, that's where fast setting carrier liquids come in, like Trutension instead of Squirt. And when the day's ride ends in the wet, you'll not only find yourself wishing for a re-lube the hardest, you also discover that applying lube (any lube) to a wet chain does not work quite as well as you might hope. Lube does not enter the chain even remotely as well as dry, and in sufficiently humid conditions, even after a very much not race-like leasurely break of 15 hours you can still find the chain soaking wet in the morning unless you have a dedicated drying room for your bike with something like Squirt (been there). It's probably still much less bad to have that kind of re-lube than no re-lube, but yeah, not all is well on a wet multi-day thing.

[usr]

It won't last 800 km, even in dry conditions.
- bring a wax-based lube
- bring a waxed chain and switch (but the weight!)

I did an 800km gravel race with this wax: https://www.effettomariposa.eu/pages/flowerpower-wax-lp. Even went through mud. Was still super smooth towards the end.

Interesting, Sunflower wax . Seems like a very eco-friendly option as well.

Awesome in terms of not needing reapplication as often as other drip waxes, awesome in terms of muffling chain noise and (according to ZFC) awesome in terms of reducing wear.

But all that awesome comes at a cost, the trade-off is that it's not even remotely as good at looking clean as other waxes. In terms of "omg, black! All the bikes in the magazines have silver chains!" I'd say it's about half way between some of the cleaner oils and squirt.

[basilic]

It won't last 800 km, even in dry conditions.
- bring a wax-based lube
- bring a waxed chain and switch (but the weight!)

I did an 800km gravel race with this wax: https://www.effettomariposa.eu/pages/flowerpower-wax-lp. Even went through mud. Was still super smooth towards the end.

I stand corrected. I was only commenting on immersive wax lubrication, these more elaborate products may stick better.

[wooger]

Smoove/Squirt -isn't it just wax in a bottle? I've been using Smoove for 2 years now and with a good cleaning I've been getting great performance.

It is, but there are different kinds of wax, and neither of those products is the same kind of wax that immersion wax gives you.

Smoove especially is pretty good, lasts well, but isn't remotely as clean as immersion wax, which sets hard. It also has issues penetrating the chain rollers propertly according to ZFC.

While there are other drip products that do give you the ultra clean hard wax result, with no penetration issues, there would seem no reason to use these products.

I am planning the test out the tru-tension tungsten product though, as 5 minute drying time could be ultra useful in a long audax event in rainy UK weather.

[ultimatist]

Seems like the best alternative is to relube immediately after the ride, when the chain is hot from use and sunshine, rather than next morning when it's cold and wet with dew.

After the ride is a given, unless perhaps if you are an oil traditionalist. But sleep breaks can be short, that's where fast setting carrier liquids come in, like Trutension instead of Squirt. And when the day's ride ends in the wet, you'll not only find yourself wishing for a re-lube the hardest, you also discover that applying lube (any lube) to a wet chain does not work quite as well as you might hope. Lube does not enter the chain even remotely as well as dry, and in sufficiently humid conditions, even after a very much not race-like leasurely break of 15 hours you can still find the chain soaking wet in the morning unless you have a dedicated drying room for your bike with something like Squirt (been there). It's probably still much less bad to have that kind of re-lube than no re-lube, but yeah, not all is well on a wet multi-day thing.

I can't think of a single benefit to bikes or biking from wet or drizzle. I wonder if any waxes on the market contain ceramic/hydrophobic elements... when the wax is gone but the residue remains, you can quick spin the chain dry and relube with better penetration. It's early days in this market and there is so much room for improvement.