NEW GP5000S TR
Moderator: robbosmans
Forum rules
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
The spirit of this board is to compile and organize wheels and tires related discussions.
If a new wheel tech is released, (say for example, TPU tubes, a brand new tire, or a new rim standard), feel free to start the discussion in the popular "Road". Your topic will eventually be moved here!
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2021 8:43 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
I'm in the process of collecting parts to put together an all-road build and want to run the GP5K S TR in 30mm on my 25i/32e width rims. The 30mm version of this tire seems to be out of stock almost everywhere, so they're becoming more difficult to come by, but I was able to snag one on eBay that arrived a few days ago. I was a little surprised to see it come in at 313g. That's 10+ g heavier than others have posted, and 19g heavier than Bicycle Rolling Resistance measured. Hoping the next one I find comes in a little lighter!
Also, it took me forever to find the tire size listed on the casing. I assume the tiny black lettering is the status quo on this tire? Forgive me for being a bit paranoid any time I purchase something from eBay.
Also, it took me forever to find the tire size listed on the casing. I assume the tiny black lettering is the status quo on this tire? Forgive me for being a bit paranoid any time I purchase something from eBay.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com
i switched from 28mm to 30mm gp 5000 S TR, both transparent wall.
All on roval rapide clx II.
28mm were measuring 29.5mm
30mm measure 30.6mm after one and half days and 50km.
I am fine with them.
All on roval rapide clx II.
28mm were measuring 29.5mm
30mm measure 30.6mm after one and half days and 50km.
I am fine with them.
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p
I am fine so far. Bit of comfort. Handling ok.
If i had to decide between 28 and 30, i would purchase 30 again.
SW SL8 RTP 56cm @ 9270 / CLX II / CS OSPW / CEMA BB
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p
S Epic 8 L @ XX T-Type / Berg Ratheberg 30 / Quarq / Fox Transfer SL 100mm / 3p
Has it been figured out why the transparent tire tested so much slower on BRR? It tested later. So did the compound change to a slower one, or is the casing different? Pretty much every reference to BRR and how fast the S TR is, conveniently points to the faster of two tests.
Last edited by BigBoyND on Fri Feb 09, 2024 5:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 31
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2021 1:35 am
Over 2150 k on my 28 mm TT-TR so far, and no punctures or notable wear. Where I ride, out in the country, punctures have been pretty rare, however (knock on wood!). I put over 5700 k on a set of S-TR with no punctures, either.
-Steve
Thanks for sharing. I'm considering trying them when my current tires wear out - or I may go with the regular GP5K with latex tubes. Of course I need all the speed help I can get!windscreen wrote: ↑Thu Feb 08, 2024 8:35 pmOver 2150 k on my 28 mm TT-TR so far, and no punctures or notable wear. Where I ride, out in the country, punctures have been pretty rare, however (knock on wood!). I put over 5700 k on a set of S-TR with no punctures, either.
-Steve
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
I found this odd too as I'm pretty sure the "tan wall" GP5KS-TR's have the tan wall painted or printed on and the rest of the tire is the same. That's not the case with the tube type GP5K's where the transparent tire has a different sidewall rubber compound.BigBoyND wrote: ↑Tue Feb 06, 2024 6:10 amHas it been figured out why the transparent tire tested so much slower on BRR? It tested later. So did the compound change to a slower one, or is the casing different? Pretty much every reference to BRR and how fast the S TR is, conveniently points to the faster of two tests.
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
For how much % difference in weight I personally see between exact same model / size of tire, I suspect producing tires aren't 100% consistent.
For that reason, I wouldn't be shocked if BRR tests happen to be different for the tan vs black version. I feel like that difference might even be observed between same size, same sidewall color tire as well.
For that reason, I wouldn't be shocked if BRR tests happen to be different for the tan vs black version. I feel like that difference might even be observed between same size, same sidewall color tire as well.
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:13 am
- Location: 90039
I had a defective Continental GP 5000 S TR 32 that caused my rim to drop tension all over the place causing an insane wobble. Swapped tire, everything is perfect. I'm an idiot and rode it like that for a ride
https://imgur.com/QTUJ8Ks
https://imgur.com/QTUJ8Ks
The tanwall was 3g lighter in the BRR test (255g vs 252g) and 1mm narrower (25mm measured vs. 26mm measured). Certainly 3g is normal manufacturing variance - I'm not sure about the 1mm difference in width.gurk700 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:41 pmFor how much % difference in weight I personally see between exact same model / size of tire, I suspect producing tires aren't 100% consistent.
For that reason, I wouldn't be shocked if BRR tests happen to be different for the tan vs black version. I feel like that difference might even be observed between same size, same sidewall color tire as well.
2015 Wilier Zero.7 Rim - 6.37kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
2020 Trek Emonda SLR-7 Disc - 6.86kg
2023 Specialized SL7 - 7.18kg
If you're rounding to the nearest integer, then "25" vs "26" can be 0.1 apart or 1.9 apartMocs123 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:15 amThe tanwall was 3g lighter in the BRR test (255g vs 252g) and 1mm narrower (25mm measured vs. 26mm measured). Certainly 3g is normal manufacturing variance - I'm not sure about the 1mm difference in width.gurk700 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:41 pmFor how much % difference in weight I personally see between exact same model / size of tire, I suspect producing tires aren't 100% consistent.
For that reason, I wouldn't be shocked if BRR tests happen to be different for the tan vs black version. I feel like that difference might even be observed between same size, same sidewall color tire as well.
The sizes on BRR are 24.9mm and 25.5mm. So just 0.6mm, which is within variance. I measure my tires in multiple places and different spots on the same tire can vary by that amount.
There's more to rolling resistance than width and weight. What I meant was if they are as inconsistent producing tires that are so apart in weight i'm sure they do other stuff that is inconsistent enough to make them 1-2 watt better or worse in a BRR test.Mocs123 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 10, 2024 4:15 amThe tanwall was 3g lighter in the BRR test (255g vs 252g) and 1mm narrower (25mm measured vs. 26mm measured). Certainly 3g is normal manufacturing variance - I'm not sure about the 1mm difference in width.gurk700 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 09, 2024 10:41 pmFor how much % difference in weight I personally see between exact same model / size of tire, I suspect producing tires aren't 100% consistent.
For that reason, I wouldn't be shocked if BRR tests happen to be different for the tan vs black version. I feel like that difference might even be observed between same size, same sidewall color tire as well.
Let's not forget whatever % inaccuracy that may come from the BRR test too. it's not like they are 100% accurate.
So it would make sense that it all adds up to 1 or 2 watt difference.
I'm surprised when people take all the aero, chain efficiency, rolling resistance, etc tests as 100% accurate. They are not. They can't be. It's just a good starting point. Chances are top 3-5 of whatever they are testing is indeed the top 5 but the order of them might be not so clear cut.
All that to say, I'm pretty sure color of a tire doesn't change rolling resistance and if BRR tested enough all black tires in the same size they would end up a watt or 2 different as well like the tan one.
Visit starbike.com Online Retailer for HighEnd cycling components
Great Prices ✓ Broad Selection ✓ Worldwide Delivery ✓
www.starbike.com