Careful, I only said a 12 speed cassette ahead of 12 speed shifters would be premature.
It seems to me, despite having multiple 3T employees "contribute" to this thread, and even entertain the idea of 12 instead of offering clarification or correcting any misunderstanding, 3T rather enjoys the attention and publicity gained from the fake news. Not that I'm the target customer, which as already been clearly established, but I don't think I'd buy from a company that employs such marketing tactics and enjoys being the beneficiary of "fake news" and to that extent promotes it or at the very least refuses to clarify or correct when given the opportunity and can only be compelled to offer an intentionally ambiguous clarification when confronted with hard facts.
Do you recall riding a 2 x 9 system on the road? Have you had a big increase in performance, range, or reliability when you moved to 2 x 11s? What bonus gear did you get? A 15t? an 18t? Did the addition of those cogs suddenly flatten the climbs, increase your speed on the flats and give you the strength to comfortably spin at 50kph?
This is quite the silly assertion, full of inaccuracy. I'm not sure if you recall riding 2x9. The standard small cog was 12t, except for time trial cassettes with 21t or 23t big cogs, or MTB cassettes. Sometimes even 13t small cogs. Refer to Shimano tech docs on CS-7700, CS-6500 and CS-5500.
The 11t cog only became standard during the second generation of 10 speed when compacts became the norm in order to maximize range. Refer to Shimano tech docs CS-7800 and CS-7900, etc. But it should be established that going from 9 to 10, and by extension 11, yes, it did give us the ability to pedal 50+kph at comfortable cadences. I personally rarely use this ratio, but I know several riders who feel much more comfortable pedaling downhill instead of tucking, especially neophytes. It doesn't take much strength to pedal downhill at 50kph, if you have the strength to get up such an incline in the first place. Because they are often adding so little power to the system, they actually prefer higher gears and lower cadence so there is some resistance.
Regarding the jump to 11 speed, I gained the 16t cog on a SRAM 11-28. I have my own opinions of why I dislike the Shimano 11-28, and 11s is for the most part, a waste for that specific cassette. It should be quite obvious to anyone not being intentionally obtuse and misleading what speed range cogs in the 15-18t range help at. Yes, it does help on the flats, many people don't like widely spaced cassettes, that's why road cassettes tend to have narrower gaps than MTB cassettes. I don't have to switch between a gear too high and a gear too low trying to find my comfort zone. If not an actual speed increase, then it is at least reflected in a comfort increase. A comfort increase in the gear range I most frequently use.
Alternatively, I could have added a 32t cog instead of the 16t cog, which indeed would help flatten hills. Having one or the other means I can have both and not have to pick between a 16t or 32t. It's not merely adding a cog. It's gaining the benefits of two different cassettes from the previous generation. Clearly this doesn't matter to people who think that people who don't know how front derailers work should be expected to swap out cassettes based on terrain. They'd simply change their cassettes.
For some consumers the change from an 9 or 10 speed group to 11s has been about added range, moving from ~267% to 330% for example.
No, that's simply an effect of adding wider ranges at all gear levels to make road cycling more accessible. You can get the same range, 50x34 with 11-32 with Claris. Refer to
http://www.bikesdirect.com/products/mot ... age_sl.htm for an example, since apparently, people may not be following trends on the lower end of road cycling equipment. It's the narrow cassettes with small gear jumps that are found by upgrading speeds, not wider range. Note as a general trend, it tends to be narrow range cassettes omitted from lower end lines. There are wide range cassettes available all the way down. Refer to CS-5800 and CS-6800. There are fewer options and Shimano refuses to offer a cassette with both 11t and 16t at the 105 level. The wide range options are retained.
Many don't ride a specific speed, power, cadence, etc. They simply pedal off.
Yes, and they could pedal off without an aero carbon bike, get something equipped with Shimano Claris and enjoy wide and huge gear jumps too. (but they'd have to use their left shifter, the horror) Certainly while aerobikes may benefit anyone at any speed, and a light bike may help any rider at any strength level, it would seem odd for someone that doesn't care about those things to spend money an aero carbon bike. Even slower riders I know with nice bikes still care about those things. I'm certainly not the fastest rider and I care about those things. Oddly enough, the people I know who don't care have drunk the Grant Peterson kool aid, and are more likely to be riding Surly with FAT rubber and the like.
This is not a bike for everyone, but doesn't the industry have enough of "those" already?
That's great that this is now admitted to be a fred niche bike, because before I had a 3T employee trying to pour kool aid down my throat insisting that 1x is so much better for normal use, not just niche use, and the only reason I wanted 2x was because I was emulating pro chainrings. Pardon me if you get a differing opinion from your kool aid. Indeed, what the industry needs is aero carbon bikes for people who don't know how to use front derailers, just want to pedal and go and have massive range (the Allez sprint for example, is not nearly as offensive, because it's designed around a niche where 1x makes sense).